Also, you can purchase to market your business or company's brand, which can pay off well with a surge in sales. While these bags were easy to hold open and fill, and were nice and slim, they were too flexible and didn’t stand up straight, which made them tough to dry.Worried about where to get wholesale bags designed to suit carrying and holding various items ranging from grocery, food, or pharmaceuticals? At you can find reusable ziplock bag produced for a wide variety of use to suit your needs. They did, however, leak when shaken upside down-and then completely broke open and flooded the counter with blue water.
W&P Porter Bags Bundle: These lay-flat bags also featured a clear front like our winner, which was nice. This model comes with a specified sandwich bag, however the zipper caught on the sandwich and shredded it. Xomoo Reusable Food Container Silicone Bags: Also sharing its design with ZipTop and WinRock, these bags were easy to fill, but they leaked. They are clearly built to be stored upright, but that doesn’t excuse its leakage when inverted, shaken, and knocked over. ZipTop Reusable Silicone Food Storage Bags: By standing up and staying wide open all on its own, this model was a delight to fill (also to clean and air dry!). WinRock was very easy to fill and also better at staying closed when filled all the way to the top-where the other two popped open. WinRock Reusable Silicone Food Storage Bag: With a similar design to both Xomoo and ZipTop, this model outperformed both in the leakage test, but still did leak when inverted and shaken. It did not stand up or stay open on its own, but we would still recommend this one before the ZipTop, Winrock, Xomoo, and W&P Porter models. It fell behind from having a too-small opening-shredding sandwiches and making cleanup a pain. Stasher Silicone Reusable 4-Pack Bundle: This model performed okay in the leakage test, dribbling only slightly when shaken upside down. Serious Eats / Eric King The Competition Silicone models Cleanup tests: Over the course of testing, we evaluated how easy each bag was to hand-wash with warm soapy water and a sponge, noting especially whether their crevices trapped debris and how well they stood up straight on a drying rack. Usability tests: Throughout testing, we evaluated how easy the bags were to fill and open and close. After waiting eight hours, then hand-washing the bag, we smelled the inside and noted how stained the bags were, and how much they held onto the spice’s scent. Smells and staining test: We smeared a mixture of 1/4 teaspoon of turmeric and 1 teaspoon of neutral oil inside the medium bag from each set. 
Storage tests: All the bags were placed in the fridge to see how well they fit on the shelves or in the produce drawers, and whether their design (flat, stand-up, rigid, flexible) helped or hurt how efficiently they used up the space.Then, we tested how well each medium bag fit a peanut butter and jelly sandwich-or used the specifically designated sandwich bag if the set featured one.
Filling tests: We filled each small bag with six ounces of blueberries, each medium bag with 8.5 ounces of strawberries, and each large bag with 2.8 ounces of stripped kale leaves cut into one-inch pieces.We then held each over a tray lined with paper towels, inverting the bag for 30 seconds, shaking it vigorously for 10 seconds and then knocking each bag onto the paper towels five times, documenting any leaks. Leakage test: To see how leakproof each bag was, we filled each size (small, medium, and large) from every brand with 1/2-cup, 3/4-cup, 1 1/2 cups of blue-dyed water.A reusable food storage bag that leaks? No thanks.
0 kommentar(er)
